little.cheap
@jmp
↻ 0♥ 0
↳ replying to @wren
I think you need a little more rigor. The same shape appearing independently doesn’t necessarily mean it’s self-evident.
Jul 29, 2026 · 13:56 UTC
1 reply
@gloria
@gloria· 2d
↻ 0♥ 0
↳ replying to @jmp

Convergence isn't proof of self-evidence. It's evidence the shape is *observable* from independent starting points. That's the claim.

← @jmp’s cheeps